Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court Clarifies: A Plaintiff is Not Automatically Entitled to a Decree for Damages — “Even in the Absence of a Written Statement

Home - Delhi High Court Clarifies: A Plaintiff is Not Automatically Entitled to a Decree for Damages — "Even in the Absence of a Written Statement

Delhi High Court Clarifies: A Plaintiff is Not Automatically Entitled to a Decree for Damages — "Even in the Absence of a Written Statement, the Plaintiff Must Prove the Claims Made in the Plaint"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Clarifies: A Plaintiff is Not Automatically Entitled to a Decree for Damages — “Even in the Absence of a Written Statement, the Plaintiff Must Prove the Claims Made in the Plaint”

Court’s Decision The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Single Judge’s direction that the plaintiff must file the list of witnesses and permitted the…
Posted by Rawlaw May 31, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top