Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB

Home - Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB

Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB, Rules LTCG Exemption Under Normal Provisions Unaffected by MAT Inclusion
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Validates ₹247 Crore Long-Term Capital Gains Exemption: Clarifies Interplay Between Section 10(38) and Section 115JB, Rules LTCG Exemption Under Normal Provisions Unaffected by MAT Inclusion

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court rejected the Revenue’s contention that the exemption under Section 10(38) of the Act was improperly allowed. It held that the Assessee was entitled to…
Posted by Rawlaw December 26, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Suits to Cancel Instruments on Grounds of Fraud Commence from the Date Fraud Becomes Known, Not from Execution of the Document; Rejection of Plaint under Order VII Rule 11 Not Justified When Fraud and Misrepresentation Are Pleaded
  • Karnataka High Court: Civil Suits to Restrain Arbitration Are Barred — Disputes Over Jurisdiction, Validity, or Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements Must Be Raised Before the Arbitral Tribunal Under Section 16 of the A&C Act; Court Sets Aside Injunction Against LCIA Arbitration
  • Bombay High Court: Senior Citizen Neglected After Transferring Property to Son — Court Upholds Maintenance Tribunal’s Order Declaring Gift Deed Void, Holding that Love and Affection Is the Implied Condition of a Gift and Neglect Post-Transfer Justifies Its Cancellation
  • Kerala High Court Acquits Officer Convicted Under Prevention of Corruption Act: “Proof of Demand Is Sine Qua Non for Conviction” — Court Finds Hostile Witness and Inconsistent Evidence Insufficient to Sustain Conviction
  • Kerala High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case: “Failure to Prove Compliance with Section 50 and Unexplained Delay in Forwarding Samples Fatal to Prosecution” — Court Reaffirms Mandatory Safeguards Under NDPS Act
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top