Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

delivery

Home - delivery

dhc
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: “Commercial Plaintiff Must Prove Delivery — Presumption Under GST Rule 138(12) Cannot Substitute Proof of Contractual Performance” — Court Upholds Dismissal of ₹21 Lakh Recovery Suit

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Anish Dayal and Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre, dismissed an appeal filed by a commercial seller seeking recovery of ₹21,42,199 from a buyer,…
Posted by Rawlaw October 10, 2025
lakshadweep
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Initiates Suo Motu Action on Justice Delivery in Lakshadweep — “Access to Justice Cannot Be Denied by Geography or Distance”

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court, through a suo motu writ petition, addressed critical infrastructural, administrative, and legal service deficiencies affecting the justice delivery system in Lakshadweep. The Court observed…
Posted by Rawlaw August 25, 2025
eviction
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Restores Eviction Decree, Holds “Deemed Service” Valid Despite Postal Endorsement of ‘Not Delivered’: “Service by Registered Post Invokes Presumption of Delivery under General Clauses Act”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and restored the eviction decree passed by the Trial Court, setting aside the High Court's judgment that had quashed the decree on…
Posted by Rawlaw August 3, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top