Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Denies Trademark Registration for “ONE FOR ALL” Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Home » Denies Trademark Registration for "ONE FOR ALL" Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”
Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for "ONE FOR ALL" Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Denies Trademark Registration for “ONE FOR ALL” Used for Educational Books — “No Secondary Meaning or Distinctiveness Established Under Section 9(1)(a) of the Trade Marks Act”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, upholding the Registrar of Trade Marks’ refusal to register the mark…
Posted by Rawlaw May 31, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top