Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Home - Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Supreme Court Quashes Termination of Absentee Doctors, Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Quashes Termination of Absentee Doctors, Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India quashed the termination orders passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against doctors who had applied for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) but remained…
Posted by Rawlaw December 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top