Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Home - Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Supreme Court Quashes Termination of Absentee Doctors, Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Quashes Termination of Absentee Doctors, Directs Voluntary Retirement with Retrospective Effect from 2010: “Delay in Processing VRS Applications Cannot Justify Arbitrary Use of Article 311(2)(b)”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court of India quashed the termination orders passed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against doctors who had applied for Voluntary Retirement Scheme (VRS) but remained…
Posted by Rawlaw December 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top