Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Discharges Petitioners: Observes “Mere Allegations Without Supporting Evidence Cannot Sustain Charges” and Quashes Baseless Charges Under Section 239 Cr.P.C. Due to Lack of Evidence

Home - Discharges Petitioners: Observes "Mere Allegations Without Supporting Evidence Cannot Sustain Charges" and Quashes Baseless Charges Under Section 239 Cr.P.C. Due to Lack of Evidence

Kerala High Court Discharges Petitioners: Observes "Mere Allegations Without Supporting Evidence Cannot Sustain Charges" and Quashes Baseless Charges Under Section 239 Cr.P.C. Due to Lack of Evidence
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Discharges Petitioners: Observes “Mere Allegations Without Supporting Evidence Cannot Sustain Charges” and Quashes Baseless Charges Under Section 239 Cr.P.C. Due to Lack of Evidence

Court's Decision The Kerala High Court, presided over by Justice Dr. Kauser Edappagath, reviewed a criminal revision petition filed by the petitioners (accused Nos. 5 and 6) challenging the dismissal…
Posted by Rawlaw March 5, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top