Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes “Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt

Home » Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes "Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt
Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes "Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt," Affirms Limited Scope of Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, and Restricts Article 227 Interference in Trial Court Decisions
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes “Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt,” Affirms Limited Scope of Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, and Restricts Article 227 Interference in Trial Court Decisions

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a trial court order that had rejected an application under Order…
Posted by Rawlaw March 5, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top