Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes “Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt

Home - Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes "Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes "Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt," Affirms Limited Scope of Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, and Restricts Article 227 Interference in Trial Court Decisions
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Petition to Recall Witness After 27 Years: Emphasizes “Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt,” Affirms Limited Scope of Order 18 Rule 17 CPC, and Restricts Article 227 Interference in Trial Court Decisions

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a trial court order that had rejected an application under Order…
Posted by Rawlaw March 5, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top