Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Home » Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules Section 32A IBC Grants Corporate Debtor Immunity from Prosecution Post-Resolution Plan but Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court, while adjudicating the petition under Section 482 CrPC (now Section 528 BNSS), refused to quash the FIR against Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd. The…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 31, 2024

Recent News

Delhi High Court quashes AIIMS rejection of DM Critical Care Medicine candidature—”1095 days residency can be cumulative across institutions, merit cannot be defeated by technicalities”
Delhi High Court acquits municipal officer in 1993 bribery case—”Sanction found mechanical, demand of illegal gratification not proved, conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act set aside”
Delhi High Court refuses to set aside arbitral award in semiconductor supply dispute—”No perversity in contract interpretation, Section 34 challenge dismissed”
Delhi High Court holds security services tender must comply with statutory supervisor norms and GeM random selection rule—”Arbitrary turnover-based award struck down, writ disposed with binding directions”
Delhi High Court permits accused to attend brother-in-law’s wedding under strict police custody—”Interim bail declined, humanitarian access allowed”

Scroll to Top