Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Home - Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules Section 32A IBC Grants Corporate Debtor Immunity from Prosecution Post-Resolution Plan but Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court, while adjudicating the petition under Section 482 CrPC (now Section 528 BNSS), refused to quash the FIR against Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd. The…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 31, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court: Arbitral award valid even without formal counterclaim — “Substance over form prevails in investor compensation dispute”
Delhi High Court: Bail granted in NDPS case despite commercial quantity— “Defective sampling and doubtful ganja composition weaken prosecution case”
Delhi High Court: Approval of dismissal under Industrial Disputes Act not res judicata — “Absence of inquiry makes termination illegal, reinstatement upheld”
Delhi High Court: Uttar Pradesh tender conditions upheld — “Local manufacturing mandate valid, courts won’t rewrite policy unless arbitrary”
Bombay High Court: Academic marks irrelevant to future income — “Compensation for deceased medical student enhanced to ₹46 lakh”

Scroll to Top