Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Home - Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Rules Section 32A IBC Grants Corporate Debtor Immunity from Prosecution Post-Resolution Plan but Does Not Bar Investigation into ₹409.26 Crore Bank Fraud Allegations

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court, while adjudicating the petition under Section 482 CrPC (now Section 528 BNSS), refused to quash the FIR against Gangakhed Sugar and Energy Ltd. The…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 31, 2024

Recent News

Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash POCSO Case Against Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Assistant Professor Accused of Inappropriately Touching Children During ‘Dark Room’ Game at Birthday Party — “One Credible Statement Is Enough to Face Trial”
Karnataka High Court Restrains Hereditary Disruption at Sri Lakshmi Janardhana Temple — “Thantriship Shall Not Descend Upon Any Outsider, But Only to a Legitimate Member of Traditional Lineage Rotating for the Last 53 Years”
Allahabad High Court Invokes Article 227 to Ensure Timely Disposal of Service Claim — “Procedural Inertia Cannot Defeat Access to Justice”; Directs Tribunal to Decide Petition Within Eight Months
Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against In-Laws in Dowry Cruelty Case — “Entire Complaint Is Dedicated to Horrendous Acts of the Husband; General Allegations Against In-Laws Insufficient”
Karnataka High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against BESCOM Assistant Engineer for Demanding Bribe to Ensure Electricity Supply — “This Is Not a Case of a Failed Trap; Prima Facie Demand and Acceptance Made Out”

Scroll to Top