Emphasizes Mandatory Compliance with DCPR 2034 Regulations

Home - Emphasizes Mandatory Compliance with DCPR 2034 Regulations

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects Developer’s Claim for Additional TDR, Emphasizes Mandatory Compliance with DCPR 2034 Regulations

Court’s Decision The High Court of Bombay dismissed the petition, stating that the petitioner cannot claim benefits under the new DCPR 2034 without fully or partially converting the project to…

Posted by

Rawlaw January 10, 2025

Recent News

Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954

Scroll to Top