Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Enhances Compensation to ₹37.80 Lakhs in Motor Accident Case: Recognizes Adult Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents

Home - Enhances Compensation to ₹37.80 Lakhs in Motor Accident Case: Recognizes Adult Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation to ₹37.80 Lakhs in Motor Accident Case: Recognizes Adult Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents, Corrects High Court's Exclusion and Ensures Fair Assessment of Dependency and Future Prospects
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation to ₹37.80 Lakhs in Motor Accident Case: Recognizes Adult Sons and Married Daughter as Dependents, Corrects High Court’s Exclusion and Ensures Fair Assessment of Dependency and Future Prospects

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court overturned the decision of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had excluded adult sons and a married daughter of the deceased from the scope…
Posted by Rawlaw February 11, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top