Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice”

Home - "Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice"

Bombay High Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: "Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Rejects Additional Evidence in Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC: “Failure to Establish Due Diligence and Relevance; ₹5 Lakh Costs Imposed for Delaying Justice”

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the appellants' Chamber Summons seeking to introduce additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27(1)(aa) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC). It ruled…
Posted by Rawlaw December 28, 2024

Recent News

  • Calcutta High Court Denies Summary Judgment on Commission Claim: “Triable Issues Exist; No Summary Decree Can Be Passed Without Evidence”
  • Patna High Court Grants Relief to Former Block Officer in Certificate Recovery: “No Coercive Steps Until Objections Decided Under Section 10 of the Public Demands Recovery Act”
  • Calcutta High Court Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Against Deceased Assessee: “Assessing Officer Cannot Issue Notice to a Dead Person When Legal Heirs Are Known”
  • Kerala High Court Declares Forfeiture of Earnest Money Illegal in Absence of Contractual Breach: “In the Absence of Breach, There Is No Justification for Retaining the Advance”
  • Patna High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Proceedings for NH-106 Due to Failure to Serve Personal Notice: “Without Individual Notice Under Section 3G(3), Compensation Proceedings Are Void”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top