Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Family Law India

Home » Family Law India
Delhi-High-Court-Upholds-Interim-Maintenance-Capability-to-Earn-and-Actual-Earnings-Are-Distinct-Maintenance-Cannot-Be-Denied-on-Mere-Capability
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance: “Capability to Earn and Actual Earnings Are Distinct; Maintenance Cannot Be Denied on Mere Capability”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband’s appeal challenging the Family Court’s order granting Rs. 25,000 per month as interim maintenance to the wife under Section 24 of…
Posted by Rawlaw July 10, 2025
Delhi-High-Court-Clarifies-Ad-Interim-Maintenance-Is-Not-Automatic-Must-Be-From-Order-Date-While-Upholding-₹6000-Monthly-Relief-to-Wife-Pending-Interim-Maintenance-Application
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Clarifies: “Ad-Interim Maintenance Is Not Automatic, Must Be From Order Date” While Upholding ₹6,000 Monthly Relief to Wife Pending Interim Maintenance Application

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s grant of ₹6,000 per month as ad-interim maintenance to the wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code during…
Posted by Rawlaw July 6, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
  • Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top