Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

footwear

Home - footwear

power, powerflex
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court refuses to soften interim trademark ban on “Power” footwear branding — “Tagline isn’t confusing, but the mark ‘Power Flex’ can’t stay”, both appeals dismissed with one tweak

1. Court’s decision The Delhi High Court (Division Bench) largely upheld an interim injunction in a pending trademark infringement suit over footwear branding where the registered proprietor of the mark…
Posted by Rawlaw January 6, 2026
power
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court restrains use of ‘POWER’ as dominant mark in footwear — “Suggestive marks with long goodwill deserve strong interim protection” while partly modifying injunction

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court, deciding cross-appeals in a long-running trademark dispute, upheld the grant of an interim injunction restraining use of the word “POWER” as a trademark or…
Posted by Rawlaw December 17, 2025
aqualite, relaxo
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court upholds interim injunction protecting footwear design—“At first glance, the visual impression shows clear imitation; novelty need not be complex”

1. Court’s decision The Delhi High Court has refused to interfere with an interim injunction granted by a commercial court restraining a footwear manufacturer from producing and selling shoes that…
Posted by Rawlaw November 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top