Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Grants Ad-Interim Anticipatory Bail in 2007 Sale Deed Forgery Case Involving Alleged Use of Forged Notary Seal; Accepts Undertaking That Document Will Not Be Acted Upon

Home - Grants Ad-Interim Anticipatory Bail in 2007 Sale Deed Forgery Case Involving Alleged Use of Forged Notary Seal; Accepts Undertaking That Document Will Not Be Acted Upon

Bombay High Court Grants Ad-Interim Anticipatory Bail in 2007 Sale Deed Forgery Case Involving Alleged Use of Forged Notary Seal; Accepts Undertaking That Document Will Not Be Acted Upon
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Grants Ad-Interim Anticipatory Bail in 2007 Sale Deed Forgery Case Involving Alleged Use of Forged Notary Seal; Accepts Undertaking That Document Will Not Be Acted Upon

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, by a common ad-interim order dated 16 May 2025, granted anticipatory bail to the applicants in two connected anticipatory bail applications, noting that the…
Posted by Rawlaw May 21, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top