Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

Home - Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: "Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review"
Posted inNews

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: “Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Chhattisgarh, presided over by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey, dismissed two review petitions filed by the State of Chhattisgarh. These petitions sought to challenge the…
Posted by Rawlaw November 29, 2024

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top