Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

Home - Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: "Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review"
Posted inNews

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: “Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Chhattisgarh, presided over by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey, dismissed two review petitions filed by the State of Chhattisgarh. These petitions sought to challenge the…
Posted by Rawlaw November 29, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top