Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

Home - Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: "Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review"
Posted inNews

High Court of Chhattisgarh Rejects Review Petitions Under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule 1 CPC: “Grounds for Review Were Merely an Attempt to Reargue the Case and Did Not Meet the Limited Scope of Review”

Court’s Decision The High Court of Chhattisgarh, presided over by Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey, dismissed two review petitions filed by the State of Chhattisgarh. These petitions sought to challenge the…
Posted by Rawlaw November 29, 2024

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top