Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: “Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership”

Home - Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: "Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership"

Kerala High Court Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: "Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership"
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: “Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership”

Court's Decision The Kerala High Court quashed the orders issued by the Assistant Educational Officer, the Additional Director of Education, and the Government (Exts. P6(a), P8, and P9) that rejected…
Posted by Rawlaw February 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case: “General Allegations Without Specific Acts Do Not Constitute a Prima Facie Case”; Emphasizes Need for Specific Evidence in Domestic Violence Cases
  • Jammu & Kashmir High Court Affirms Educational Trust’s Exclusive Ownership Over Suit Pathway; Rejects Appellants’ Easementary Claims for Lack of Evidence Under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC
  • Delhi High Court: “There Is Ample Material to Create Doubt on the Genuineness of the Encounter”; Orders CBI Probe Into 2006 Special Cell Encounter, Citing NHRC and Magisterial Findings of a “Fake Encounter”
  • Calcutta High Court Dismisses Revision Application in Motor Accident Claim Case: Upholds Procedural Flexibility, Validates Amendment for Treatment Expenses, and Acceptance of Delayed Written Statement to Emphasize Justice Over Procedural Rigidity
  • Karnataka High Court Dismisses Pleas Against No-Confidence Motion Notices, Holds That 15-Day Notice Period Runs From Meeting Date, Not Service Date
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top