Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: “Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership”

Home » Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: "Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership"
Kerala High Court Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: "Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership"
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Holds Managerial Appointment Rejection Invalid Due to Procedural Errors: “Rule 4 and Rule 5 Do Not Apply to Change of Management Involving Change of Ownership”

Court's Decision The Kerala High Court quashed the orders issued by the Assistant Educational Officer, the Additional Director of Education, and the Government (Exts. P6(a), P8, and P9) that rejected…
Posted by Rawlaw February 23, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top