Holds State Cannot Reargue or Rectify Omissions Through Review

Home - Holds State Cannot Reargue or Rectify Omissions Through Review

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court: “A Forensic Defeat Cannot Be Avenged by an Invitation to Have a Second Look”; Dismisses Review Petition, Holds State Cannot Reargue or Rectify Omissions Through Review

Court's Decision The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the review petition filed by the State against its earlier decision in WPS No. 6205/2019. The court ruled that the review petition…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 5, 2024

Recent News

“Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
“Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
“Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F

Scroll to Top