Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

IGST

Home » IGST
CESTAT: “When the Law Itself Does Not Permit Penalty, No Authority Can Create It” — Tribunal Strikes Down Interest, Penalty, Confiscation and Redemption Fine on IGST Demand under Advance Authorization Scheme
Posted inNews

CESTAT: “When the Law Itself Does Not Permit Penalty, No Authority Can Create It” — Tribunal Strikes Down Interest, Penalty, Confiscation and Redemption Fine on IGST Demand under Advance Authorization Scheme

Court’s decision The CESTAT (Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai), allowed the appeal filed by the importer by setting aside the confiscation, redemption fine, penalty under Section 114A,…
Posted by Rawlaw November 16, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
  • Delhi High Court refers sprawling family partition and business disputes to arbitration — parties ad idem; court gives effect to testamentary and partnership arbitration mechanisms, vacates status quo on ₹20 crore security
  • Delhi High Court restores arbitral award in Prasar Bharati–Stracon broadcast rights dispute — interpretation of cricket days upheld; limited judicial interference reaffirmed
  • Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in ₹25 lakh MoU dispute — coercion plea, cash transaction objections left to tribunal; Section 11 court confined to prima facie existence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top