labour court
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court: No Writ Interference in Labour Court’s Finding of Illegal Termination — “Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Reappreciated Under Article 226; Abandonment Plea Rejected” — ₹1.5 Lakh Lump-Sum Compensation to Terminated Workman Upheld

Court’s decision The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Precision Scientific and Testing Equipment Pvt. Ltd. challenging a Labour Court award directing payment of ₹1,50,000 as lump-sum…
February 19, 2026
workman
Posted inNews

“Once the workman discharges the initial burden, failure of the employer—being the custodian of records—to produce muster rolls and wage registers invites adverse inference”: Delhi High Court dismisses management’s writ against Labour Court award, upholds finding of illegal termination for non-compliance with Section 25F of the ID Act, affirms reinstatement with 50% back wages or ₹3 lakh compensation, and reiterates that writ jurisdiction cannot be used to reappreciate evidence

HEADNOTE M/s Punjab Steel Works v. Shambhu Saran Singh Court: High Court of DelhiBench: Justice Chandrasekharan SudhaDate of Judgment: 11 December 2025Citation: W.P.(C) 6264/2019Laws / Sections Involved: Articles 226 &…
January 24, 2026