Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: “Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty”

Home » Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: "Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty"
Bombay High Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: "Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: “Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty”

Court's Decision: The High Court concluded that the defendant had breached the court's injunction order, particularly regarding the second limb of the order, which involved the seizure of electronic devices.…
Posted by Rawlaw January 29, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
  • Delhi High Court refers sprawling family partition and business disputes to arbitration — parties ad idem; court gives effect to testamentary and partnership arbitration mechanisms, vacates status quo on ₹20 crore security
  • Delhi High Court restores arbitral award in Prasar Bharati–Stracon broadcast rights dispute — interpretation of cricket days upheld; limited judicial interference reaffirmed
  • Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in ₹25 lakh MoU dispute — coercion plea, cash transaction objections left to tribunal; Section 11 court confined to prima facie existence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top