Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: “Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty”

Home - Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: "Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty"

Bombay High Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: "Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Imposes Rs. 5 Lakhs Penalty for Defendant’s Failure to Comply with Injunction Order: “Defendant’s Contumacious Conduct in Withholding and Deleting Sensitive Data Warrants Civil Penalty”

Court's Decision: The High Court concluded that the defendant had breached the court's injunction order, particularly regarding the second limb of the order, which involved the seizure of electronic devices.…
Posted by Rawlaw January 29, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top