Kerala High Court Dismisses Review Petition

Home - Kerala High Court Dismisses Review Petition

Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Quashes 26-Year-Old Customs Recovery Notice Under Section 143 of the Customs Act, Rules Delay Unreasonable in Absence of Fraud or Suppression

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court quashed the recovery notice issued under Section 143 of the Customs Act, 1962, against Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., ruling that initiating proceedings after a…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 24, 2024

Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Dismisses Review Petition, Affirms Decree Validity Despite Death of Respondent During Appeal, Noting That Formal Substitution of Legal Representatives is Unnecessary if Deceased Party Did Not Participate or Contest the Proceedings

Court’s Decision: The Kerala High Court, comprising of Justice Anil K. Narendran and Justice P.G. Ajithkumar, dismissed the review petition filed under Section 114 and Order XLVII, Rule 1 of…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 23, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court Holds That Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Lapses If No Acquisition Steps Are Taken: “Mere Payment for Measurement Charges Is Not a Step Towards Acquisition; Authorities Cannot Deprive Landowners of Their Rights Indefinitely”
Supreme Court Holds Termination of Daily-Wage Workmen Illegal: “Employer Cannot Use Recruitment Ban to Deny Regularization; Sections 6E & 6N of U.P. Industrial Disputes Act Violated”—Orders Reinstatement with Back Wages and Regularization Process
Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitral Award: Rejects Challenge Against Liquidated Damages, Unlawful Encashment of Performance Bank Guarantee, and Misinterpretation of Price Variation Clause in Metro Rail Supply Contract Dispute
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor’s Claims: Holds Clause 49.5 of GCC Validly Bars Damages for Employer-Caused Delays, Estoppel Prevents Appellant From Reneging on Written Undertakings, and Judicial Intervention Under Section 37 Arbitration Act is Limited
Bombay High Court Quashes IFS Officer’s Transfer Due to Procedural Irregularities: Holds Handwritten Alterations in Civil Services Board Minutes Render Decision Invalid, Leaves Open Question of State vs. Central Rules for Future Determination

Scroll to Top