Limitation and Vesting Claims Rejected as Unsupported

Home » Limitation and Vesting Claims Rejected as Unsupported

Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court: Pre-emptor’s Right Affirmed Based on Contiguous Ownership Under Section 8 of West Bengal Land Reforms Act; Limitation and Vesting Claims Rejected as Unsupported

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court dismissed a revision application challenging the trial and appellate courts' orders, which upheld a pre-emption application filed under Section 8 of the West Bengal…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 26, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed

Scroll to Top