Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Limitation Period

Home » Limitation Period
Bombay High Court: “Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under the Payment of Gratuity Act” — Court Quashes Appellate Authority’s Order Extending Limitation Period
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court: “Delay Beyond 120 Days Cannot Be Condoned Under the Payment of Gratuity Act” — Court Quashes Appellate Authority’s Order Extending Limitation Period

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, set aside the order of the Industrial Court and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which had condoned a…
Posted by Rawlaw October 28, 2025
Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Order: "Violation of Limitation Period Under Section 153 Renders Order Void; Procedural Irregularities Highlighted"
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Quashes Time-Barred Reassessment Order: “Violation of Limitation Period Under Section 153 Renders Order Void; Procedural Irregularities Highlighted”

Court’s Decision The `Bombay High Court` quashed the reassessment order passed by the Income Tax Department under Section 143(3) read with Sections 147 and 144B of the Income Tax Act.…
Posted by Rawlaw December 28, 2024
Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Finds Claims Within Limitation Period Due to Acknowledgment of Debt, Rejects Counterclaims as Time-Barred for Not Being Part of Ongoing Negotiations”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award, Finds Claims Within Limitation Period Due to Acknowledgment of Debt, Rejects Counterclaims as Time-Barred for Not Being Part of Ongoing Negotiations”

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals filed by OPG Power Generation Pvt. Ltd. and Gita Power and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., upholding the arbitral tribunal’s award in favor of…
Posted by Rawlaw September 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top