Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake

Home » Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake
Supreme Court Restores Interest on Enhanced Compensation for Procedural Delays: “Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake”
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Restores Interest on Enhanced Compensation for Procedural Delays: “Litigants Should Not Be Penalized for Counsel’s Defaults When Substantive Justice Is at Stake”

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal and modified the High Court's judgment. It restored interest on the enhanced compensation for the period from June 22, 2016, to…
Posted by Rawlaw December 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top