Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Madras High Court

Home - Madras High Court - Page 3

poramboke land
Posted inNews

Madras High Court holds that revenue authority’s power to evict encroachers on government poramboke land is statutory in nature: “Court cannot substitute its own satisfaction”

Court’s Decision The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction proceedings initiated by the Revenue Divisional Officer under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905. The Court held…
Posted by Rawlaw July 24, 2025
reserved forest
Posted inNews

Madras High Court Dismisses Title Claim Over Forest Land: “No Independent Title Proven, No Challenge to Reserve Forest Declaration” — Second Appeal Rejected for Lack of Documentary Proof

Court’s Decision The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a second appeal filed by the plaintiffs challenging concurrent findings of the lower courts that had rejected their suit…
Posted by Rawlaw June 24, 2025
Suit Property is Trust Property”: Supreme Court Affirms Madras HC Decision on Kamakala Kameshwarar Temple, Rejects Appeal and Res Judicata Claim as Earlier Litigation Dealt with a Different Issue
Posted inNews

Suit Property is Trust Property”: Supreme Court Affirms Madras HC Decision on Kamakala Kameshwarar Temple, Rejects Appeal and Res Judicata Claim as Earlier Litigation Dealt with a Different Issue

Court's Decision:The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Sri Siddaraja Manicka Prabhu Temple, upholding the Madras High Court's decision that the suit property is trust property. The court ruled…
Posted by Rawlaw September 16, 2024

Posts pagination

Previous page 1 2 3

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top