Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Motor Vehicles Act

Home - Motor Vehicles Act

Supreme Court
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Flags “Urgent Need for Uniform Formula” and Refers Foreign-Income Accident Compensation Issue to Larger Bench, “Divergent Views Demand Authoritative Clarity”

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court examined whether courts must moderate or directly adopt the foreign income of an accident victim while computing future prospects compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.…
Posted by Rawlaw November 7, 2025
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Enhances-Motor-Accident-Compensation-Tribunal-Erred-in-Mechanically-Relying-Only-on-Oral-Deposition—Pleadings-Clearly-Indicated-Victims-Occupation-and-Earnings
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Enhances Motor Accident Compensation: “Tribunal Erred in Mechanically Relying Only on Oral Deposition—Pleadings Clearly Indicated Victim’s Occupation and Earnings”

Court’s Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur, allowed the appeal in part and modified the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s award by enhancing the compensation from ₹44,879 to ₹66,879. The Court…
Posted by Rawlaw June 26, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top