Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“Neither Courts Nor Quasi-Judicial Authorities Could Compel Financial Institutions to Provide OTS Terms When No Scheme Exists”

Home - "Neither Courts Nor Quasi-Judicial Authorities Could Compel Financial Institutions to Provide OTS Terms When No Scheme Exists''

Kerala High Court: Ombudsman Cannot Mandate One-Time Settlement Without a Valid Scheme; "Neither Courts Nor Quasi-Judicial Authorities Could Compel Financial Institutions to Provide OTS Terms When No Scheme Exists
Posted inNews

Kerala High Court: Ombudsman Cannot Mandate One-Time Settlement Without a Valid Scheme; “Neither Courts Nor Quasi-Judicial Authorities Could Compel Financial Institutions to Provide OTS Terms When No Scheme Exists”

Court’s Decision: The Kerala High Court, in its judgment, set aside the order issued by the Kerala Co-operative Ombudsman directing the petitioner, a co-operative bank, to facilitate a One-Time Settlement…
Posted by Rawlaw December 24, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court’s 3 Powerful Findings: Upholds Arbitral Award — Rejects State’s Unfair Liquidated Damages for Impossible Connectivity
  • Bombay High Court’s 3 Striking Findings: Dishonest Adoption Invalid — ‘LE SHARK’ Trademark Scrapped for False Evidence
  • Bombay High Court Quashes SRA’s Acquisition of Private Land: ‘Preferential Right of Landowners to Redevelop Cannot Be Usurped by Slum Authority or Developers under Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance, and Redevelopment) Act, 1971’
  • Bombay High Court Quashes BMC’s Section 354A Notice for Roof Repairs — ‘Replacing Rusted Sheets Is Tenantable Work, Not Illegal Construction’
  • Bombay High Court’s powerful Findings: General Sales Tax Data Can’t Justify Additions — ITAT’s 15% Limit Upheld
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top