Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

“No Useful Purpose Shall Be Served by Keeping the Case Pending When Chances of Conviction Are Bleak”

Home - “No Useful Purpose Shall Be Served by Keeping the Case Pending When Chances of Conviction Are Bleak”

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Amicable Settlement: “No Useful Purpose Shall Be Served by Keeping the Case Pending When Chances of Conviction Are Bleak”
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Following Amicable Settlement: “No Useful Purpose Shall Be Served by Keeping the Case Pending When Chances of Conviction Are Bleak”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court quashed FIR No. 0259/2020 registered under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) at Police Station Sonia Vihar. The court held that the…
Posted by Rawlaw December 25, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top