Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

non-distinctive

Home » non-distinctive
Madras High Court: “Generic words cannot be monopolised” — Court vacates injunction restraining Rajasthan salon from using the mark ‘Bounce’, holds the term is descriptive and non-distinctive under trademarks act, 1999
Posted inNews

Madras High Court: “Generic words cannot be monopolised” — Court vacates injunction restraining Rajasthan salon from using the mark ‘Bounce’, holds the term is descriptive and non-distinctive under trademarks act, 1999

Court’s decision The Madras High Court vacated an ex parte interim injunction earlier granted in favour of a Chennai-based salon brand against a Udaipur-based salon accused of infringing its registered…
Posted by Rawlaw November 14, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
  • Delhi High Court refers sprawling family partition and business disputes to arbitration — parties ad idem; court gives effect to testamentary and partnership arbitration mechanisms, vacates status quo on ₹20 crore security
  • Delhi High Court restores arbitral award in Prasar Bharati–Stracon broadcast rights dispute — interpretation of cricket days upheld; limited judicial interference reaffirmed
  • Delhi High Court appoints sole arbitrator in ₹25 lakh MoU dispute — coercion plea, cash transaction objections left to tribunal; Section 11 court confined to prima facie existence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top