Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Not Mandatory”

Home - Not Mandatory"

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Vehicle Seizure Despite Procedural Lapses Under UAPA, Emphasizes National Security Over Technicalities: "Timelines Under Section 25 Are Directory, Not Mandatory"
Posted inNews

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Upholds Vehicle Seizure Despite Procedural Lapses Under UAPA, Emphasizes National Security Over Technicalities: “Timelines Under Section 25 Are Directory, Not Mandatory”

1. Court’s Decision: The Jammu & Kashmir High Court dismissed an appeal filed against the orders of the Additional Sessions Judge (NIA Court) and the Divisional Commissioner, which had confirmed…
Posted by Rawlaw January 18, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Arbitral award valid even without formal counterclaim — “Substance over form prevails in investor compensation dispute”
  • Delhi High Court: Bail granted in NDPS case despite commercial quantity— “Defective sampling and doubtful ganja composition weaken prosecution case”
  • Delhi High Court: Approval of dismissal under Industrial Disputes Act not res judicata — “Absence of inquiry makes termination illegal, reinstatement upheld”
  • Delhi High Court: Uttar Pradesh tender conditions upheld — “Local manufacturing mandate valid, courts won’t rewrite policy unless arbitrary”
  • Bombay High Court: Academic marks irrelevant to future income — “Compensation for deceased medical student enhanced to ₹46 lakh”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top