Not Vacancy” — Amendment Process Cannot Be Undermined by Judicial Direction

Home - Not Vacancy” — Amendment Process Cannot Be Undermined by Judicial Direction

Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Direction to Fill Posts Under Repealed Quota Rules — “Right to Be Considered for Promotion Arises on the Date of Consideration, Not Vacancy” — Amendment Process Cannot Be Undermined by Judicial Direction

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition filed by the Government of NCT of Delhi and quashed the order dated 16.12.2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.…

Posted by

Rawlaw May 29, 2025

Recent News

CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities

Scroll to Top