Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news Raw Law

Unfiltered Legal Insights

  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Home - Order VIII Rule 1 CPC

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit: “Time Limit under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Is Mandatory in Commercial Disputes”
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Condone Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit: “Time Limit under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Is Mandatory in Commercial Disputes”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court, Commercial Division, dismissed the defendant’s application seeking condonation of delay in filing the written statement beyond the 120-day period mandated under Order VIII Rule…
Posted by Rawlaw June 18, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Father’s Habeas Corpus Plea For Return Of Child To UK; Holds “Custody Of The Minor Child With The Mother Is Not Illegal”, Welfare Of Child Remains Paramount
  • Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Release Of Attached Property In NSEL-MPID Case; Holds “MPID Act Has No Provision Regarding Release Of Property In Favour Of The Owner, After An Order Is Passed Permitting Auction”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses Licence For Slot Machines In Five-Star Hotel, Holds “1992 Goa Amendment Act Was Never Brought Into Force” In Daman And Diu; Says “Use Of Electronic Amusement/Slot Machines Remained Prohibited”
  • Bombay High Court Restores Written Statements In Commercial Suit Filed Within Statutory Outer Limit, Holds “Service Of Summons Without Copy Of Plaint And Accompaniments Would Not Constitute Valid Service In Law”
  • Bombay High Court Refuses To Decide ULC Possession Dispute In Writ Jurisdiction, Holds “Serious Disputed Questions Of Facts Arise”; Landowners Given Liberty To File Civil Suit
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top