Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Orders Refund of ₹28.11 Crores to Appellant in HUDCO Allotment Dispute: Holds Forfeiture Invalid Due to Breach of Reciprocal Obligations

Home - Orders Refund of ₹28.11 Crores to Appellant in HUDCO Allotment Dispute: Holds Forfeiture Invalid Due to Breach of Reciprocal Obligations

Supreme Court Orders Refund of ₹28.11 Crores to Appellant in HUDCO Allotment Dispute: Holds Forfeiture Invalid Due to Breach of Reciprocal Obligations, Denies Interest Citing Manipulative Litigation Conduct
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Orders Refund of ₹28.11 Crores to Appellant in HUDCO Allotment Dispute: Holds Forfeiture Invalid Due to Breach of Reciprocal Obligations, Denies Interest Citing Manipulative Litigation Conduct

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court partially allowed the appeal filed by the appellant and directed the Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited (HUDCO) to refund the sum of ₹28,11,31,939 without…
Posted by Rawlaw February 13, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top