Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Petition Challenging Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of Cantonment Act

Home - Petition Challenging Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of Cantonment Act

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of Cantonment Act, Upholds Requirement to Deposit Disputed Tax Before Appeal, Finds No Violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(g)
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Constitutionality of Section 96(b) of Cantonment Act, Upholds Requirement to Deposit Disputed Tax Before Appeal, Finds No Violation of Articles 14 or 19(1)(g)

Court’s Decision: The Bombay High Court dismissed the petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 96(b) of the Cantonment Act, 2006, which requires the disputed tax amount to be deposited before…
Posted by Rawlaw September 26, 2024

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: “Courts cannot derail elections under Article 243-O; objections to ward formation must be raised timely” – Petitions challenging delimitation of Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samiti wards dismissed
  • Bombay High Court: “Finality under Section 16(5) of Telegraph Act bars first appeals; remedy lies under Articles 226/227” – Appeals by farmers returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC
  • Bombay High Court: “Fraud vitiates everything; Transferable Development Rights transactions must strictly comply with law” – Interim reliefs in TDR dispute denied
  • Bombay High Court: “Judicial review is not an appeal; departmental findings cannot be reappreciated if based on some evidence” – Dismissal of police constable upheld
  • Bombay High Court: “Election of a democratically elected candidate cannot be set aside on inferential basis” – Election petition dismissed for lack of material particulars under Representation of the People Act
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top