Procedural Technicalities Should Not Obstruct the Path to Justice

Home » Procedural Technicalities Should Not Obstruct the Path to Justice

Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court: “Procedural Technicalities Should Not Obstruct the Path to Justice”; Reinforces Obligation to Include Indispensable Parties in Legal Proceedings

Court's Decision: The Chhattisgarh High Court set aside the decision of the Claims Tribunal, which had dismissed an application to implead United India Insurance Company Limited as a party in…

Posted by

Rawlaw December 5, 2024

Recent News

Bombay High Court holds execution under Section 44A must remain summary—“Issues and full-fledged evidence only in exceptional cases”; order framing issues in UAE decree execution set aside
Bombay High Court refuses to quash cheque bounce cases over merged bank cheques—“Validity can be curtailed by merger, but ‘funds insufficient’ memo triggers statutory presumption”; accused must prove defence at trial
Bombay High Court upholds Industrial Court stay on city body’s circular withdrawing diploma-linked wage increments—“Customary concession can’t be ended unilaterally”,writ dismissed, status quo to continue
Bombay High Court sets aside housing society expulsion over member complaints—“Access to justice is not a privilege”; members restored, stay refused
Bombay High Court upholds statutory arbitration under Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act despite SARFAESI and RDB proceedings—“Option under RDB Act preserves Section 84 remedy”; Section 34 challenge dismissed

Scroll to Top