Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

quash criminal proceedings

Home » quash criminal proceedings
cheque dishonour
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Criminal Proceedings in Cheating Case Involving Dishonoured Cheques: “Disputed Claims in Business Transactions Cannot Be Resolved Through a Quashing Petition”

Court’s Decision The Calcutta High Court declined to quash criminal proceedings initiated under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code, observing that the issues raised by the petitioner…
Posted by Rawlaw June 25, 2025
hpcl, quashing of charhges
Posted inNews

Calcutta High Court Refuses to Quash Criminal Proceedings Against HPCL Dealers: “Scope of Quashing at Charge Framing Stage Is Limited”—Section 420 and 120B IPC Charges to Stand

Judgment Name: Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited v. State of West Bengal & Ors. Date: 17 June 2025Coram: Justice Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, Calcutta High Court Court’s Decision The Calcutta High…
Posted by Rawlaw June 19, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court issues sweeping directions to curb trademark misuse through fraudulent domain names — “Registrars, banks, and government bodies bound to act, dynamic plus injunctions approved”
  • Delhi High Court issues landmark directions to dismantle fraudulent domain name ecosystem misusing well-known trademarks — “Online soul of businesses must be protected, systemic reforms mandated”
  • Delhi High Court holds London as the juridical seat and bars the Indian challenge to the foreign arbitral award — “Part I of the Arbitration Act excluded by necessary implication, Section 34 petition not maintainable”
  • Delhi High Court strikes down compulsory use of select bank EDC terminals at petrol pumps — “Exclusive payment routing held disproportionate, dealers’ business autonomy protected”
  • Delhi High Court orders rectification of trademark register by cancelling ‘BSM’ mark — “Prior user rights prevail over later registration, bad faith adoption inferred”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top