Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Quashes FIR in ₹90 Lakh Commercial Dispute — “Breach of Contract Does Not Amount to Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust”; Terms FIR an Abuse of Process

Home » Quashes FIR in ₹90 Lakh Commercial Dispute — “Breach of Contract Does Not Amount to Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust”; Terms FIR an Abuse of Process
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in ₹90 Lakh Commercial Dispute — “Breach of Contract Does Not Amount to Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust”; Terms FIR an Abuse of Process
Posted inNews

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in ₹90 Lakh Commercial Dispute — “Breach of Contract Does Not Amount to Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust”; Terms FIR an Abuse of Process

Court’s Decision The Bombay High Court quashed FIR No. 339 of 2024 registered at Kashigaon Police Station under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC against the petitioners, holding that…
Posted by Rawlaw May 26, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court refuses to recall arbitrator appointment in Vedanta–GSPC gas dispute — foreign joint venture partner doesn’t convert case into international arbitration; jurisdictional objection premature, Section 16 remedy available
  • Supreme Court of India quashes minimum import price enforcement prior to Gazette publication — DGFT notification has no legal force until officially published; importers with prior letters of credit protected, appeals allowed
  • Delhi High Court orders perjury prosecution in arbitration fraud case — forged term sheet used to seek ₹490 crore interim relief; Section 340 invoked, Registrar directed to file complaint
  • Delhi High Court modifies MACT compensation in Oriental Insurance appeal — ITR-based income upheld, Pranay Sethi rationalisation applied; award reduced to ₹35.73 lakh
  • Delhi High Court partly sets aside arbitral award in brewery dispute — liquidated damages upheld as genuine pre-estimate; counterclaim for equipment rent revived due to ignored evidence
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top