Reaffirms Limited Judicial Review: “Court Cannot Sit in Appeal Under Article 226”

Home - Reaffirms Limited Judicial Review: "Court Cannot Sit in Appeal Under Article 226"

Posted inNews

Kerala High Court Upholds Appeal Committee’s Decision in Ottanthullal Competition, Reaffirms Limited Judicial Review: “Court Cannot Sit in Appeal Under Article 226”

Court’s Decision The Kerala High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by a minor student, challenging the decision of the Appeal Committee in an Ottanthullal competition. The court upheld the…

Posted by

Rawlaw February 15, 2025

Recent News

CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities

Scroll to Top