Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

recruitment

Home - recruitment

Delhi high court
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Upholds Rejection of OBC Certificates Issued After Cut-Off Date: “Ignorance of Law Is No Excuse in Recruitment”

Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court, comprising Justice Navin Chawla and Justice Madhu Jain, dismissed a writ petition filed by two candidates challenging the rejection of their candidature for the…
Posted by Rawlaw October 17, 2025
RPF CISF
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: “Reserved candidates availing relaxation in age or physical standards cannot migrate to unreserved seats unless rules permit; relaxed physical standards not a bar” – RPF and CISF recruitment disputes clarified

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court delivered two connected rulings. In the Railway Protection Force (RPF) recruitment case, the Court allowed the appeals filed by the RPF and set aside the…
Posted by Rawlaw September 10, 2025
age relaxation
Posted inNews

Supreme Court: “Reserved candidates availing age relaxation cannot migrate to unreserved seats if recruitment rules impose embargo; High Court erred in mechanically applying Jitendra Kumar” – Office Memorandum of 1998 upheld

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India and set aside the High Court’s directions permitting OBC candidates who had availed age relaxation to…
Posted by Rawlaw September 10, 2025

Recent News

  • “Comparable Sale Instances Must Prevail” – Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation After Finding Reference Court Erred in Ignoring Higher Valuation Evidence
  • “Arbitration Award Set Aside: Bombay High Court Slams ‘Denial of Natural Justice’ and Declares ‘An Arbitrator Must Give Reasons’ in a Powerful Ruling on Fundamental Policy Breach”
  • “Recovery Certificate Invalidated: Bombay High Court Issues a Powerful Warning That ‘Reasons Are the Soul of Justice’ While Reiterating That ‘A Registrar Must Apply His Mind Before Enforcing Recovery’”
  • Bombay High Court Declares That “A Clean Document Cannot Coexist With a Tainted Transaction,” Sets Aside Conviction After Finding Critical Contradictions in Evidence
  • Recovery Certificate under Section 101 Set Aside: Bombay High Court Holds That “Recording of Reasons Is a Fundamental Requirement” and Directs Denovo Inquiry for Non-Compliance with Rule 86A–86F
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top