Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Reinstates Conviction After High Court Wrongly Acquits Accused by Disregarding Child Witness Testimony

Home - Reinstates Conviction After High Court Wrongly Acquits Accused by Disregarding Child Witness Testimony

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction After High Court Wrongly Acquits Accused by Disregarding Child Witness Testimony, Overlooking Circumstantial Evidence, and Misapplying Legal Principles on Delay in Statement Recording and Burden of ProofSupreme Court Reinstates Conviction After High Court Wrongly Acquits Accused by Disregarding Child Witness Testimony, Overlooking Circumstantial Evidence, and Misapplying Legal Principles on Delay in Statement Recording and Burden of Proof
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Reinstates Conviction After High Court Wrongly Acquits Accused by Disregarding Child Witness Testimony, Overlooking Circumstantial Evidence, and Misapplying Legal Principles on Delay in Statement Recording and Burden of Proof

1. Court’s Decision This section explains the Supreme Court's ruling. The case involved an appeal against a High Court decision that had overturned a Trial Court's conviction. The key question…
Posted by Rawlaw February 24, 2025

Recent News

  • Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Citing Cruelty and 15-Year Separation — “Long Separation Without Intent to Resume Cohabitation Is Cruelty in Itself”
  • Kerala High Court Sets Aside Lok Adalat Award Denying Insurance Claim—“Policy Valid from Date of Premium Payment, Not Later Issuance”
  • Kerala High Court Upholds Conviction in Abetment of Suicide Case—“Dying Declaration of Victim Inspires Confidence; Accused’s Acts Left Her With No Other Option”
  • Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Trademark Registration Orders in ‘Dunlop’ Mark Dispute—“A Pretence of Reasons Is Not a Valid Decision-Making Process”: Court Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration
  • Calcutta High Court: Oral Dedication Must Be Proved by Evidence—“No Waqf Without Evidence of Dedication”; Tribunal Order Partly Set Aside; Matter Remitted for Fresh Inquiry
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top