Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rejecting “Negative Equality” Argument Under Article 14

Home - Rejecting "Negative Equality" Argument Under Article 14

Supreme Court Holds Temporary Appointments Do Not Confer Right to Reinstatement, Awards ₹5 Lakh Compensation, Rejecting "Negative Equality" Argument Under Article 14
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Holds Temporary Appointments Do Not Confer Right to Reinstatement, Awards ₹5 Lakh Compensation, Rejecting “Negative Equality” Argument Under Article 14

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court overturned the Orissa High Court’s directive to reinstate the respondent (a Computer Technician employed on a temporary basis) with full benefits. Instead, the Court held…
Posted by Rawlaw December 13, 2024

Recent News

  • Supreme Court of India holds miscellaneous application not maintainable after dismissal of special leave petition — “Court becomes functus officio,” recall plea rejected
  • Supreme Court of India: Post-retirement disciplinary penalty valid if proceedings began in service — “Deemed continuation allows pay reduction affecting pension,” appeal dismissed
  • Delhi High Court — Volkswagen fails to block Maruti Suzuki’s ‘TRANSFORMOTION’ trademark — Court finds no deceptive similarity with ‘4MOTION’
  • Supreme Court of India holds state cannot be judge in its own cause in contractual disputes — “Clause barring arbitration and courts read down, arbitral award restored”
  • Supreme Court of India holds reserved category candidates can migrate to open category despite TET relaxation — “Eligibility relaxation does not dilute merit,” merit list exclusion quashed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top