Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rejection of Time-Barred Suit Challenging Sale Deeds: Upholding Limitation Law and Locus Standi Principles Under Order VII

Home - Rejection of Time-Barred Suit Challenging Sale Deeds: Upholding Limitation Law and Locus Standi Principles Under Order VII

Orissa High Court Rejection of Time-Barred Suit Challenging Sale Deeds: Upholding Limitation Law and Locus Standi Principles Under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC"
Posted inNews

Orissa High Court Rejection of Time-Barred Suit Challenging Sale Deeds: Upholding Limitation Law and Locus Standi Principles Under Order VII, Rule 11 CPC”

Court's Decision: The Court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the trial court’s order and directing that the plaint in the suit be rejected under Order VII, Rule 11 of…
Posted by Rawlaw February 22, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Upholds Tilaknagar Industries’ Exclusive Rights Over “Mansion House” and “Savoy Club” Trademarks, Restrains Allied Blenders and Distillers from Use, Reaffirming 2011 Judgment
  • Delhi High Court Upholds Maintainability of Suit for Declaration and Cancellation of Sale Deed Without Possession: Affirms Jurisdictional Bar Under Section 50 of the Delhi Rent Control Act and Dismisses Second Appeal for Lack of Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC
  • Karnataka High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC: Directs Trial Court to Determine Whether Plaintiffs’ Declaration Claim is Barred by Limitation Under Article 59 of the Limitation Act, Ensuring Fair Adjudication of Dispute
  • Kerala High Court Dismisses Challenge to High Powered Committee’s Jurisdiction: Affirms Supreme Court’s Pan India Authority Over Elephant Welfare, Transfer, and Rehabilitation, Rejects Per Incuriam Claim Against National Oversight
  • Delhi High Court Dismisses State’s Appeal Against Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Upholds Double Presumption of Innocence and Rules That Variance in Public Analyst and CFL Reports Weakens Prosecution’s Case Under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top