Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rejects Claim of Arbitrariness by Highest Bidder; Emphasizes “Fair Participation and Public Interest Take Precedence Over Procedural Rigidity”

Home - Rejects Claim of Arbitrariness by Highest Bidder; Emphasizes "Fair Participation and Public Interest Take Precedence Over Procedural Rigidity"

Delhi High Court Upholds DDA’s Decision to Reschedule E-Auction Due to Technical Glitches, Rejects Claim of Arbitrariness by Highest Bidder; Emphasizes "Fair Participation and Public Interest Take Precedence Over Procedural Rigidity"
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Upholds DDA’s Decision to Reschedule E-Auction Due to Technical Glitches, Rejects Claim of Arbitrariness by Highest Bidder; Emphasizes “Fair Participation and Public Interest Take Precedence Over Procedural Rigidity”

Court’s Decision: The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant challenging the re-auction of a residential plot by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). The court upheld the…
Posted by Rawlaw January 28, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top