Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Home » " Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025
Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: "Right to Sue Stood Extinguished," Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: “Right to Sue Stood Extinguished,” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the Madras High Court and the trial court, ruling that the second suit filed in 2007 for specific performance was barred…
Posted by Rawlaw January 8, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court sets aside ex parte GST demand and remands matter — “Portal changes and missed notices cannot defeat natural justice; taxpayers deserve a fair hearing” while keeping vires challenge open
  • Delhi High Court grants bail in forged sale deed and impersonation case — “Parity and completion of investigation outweigh continued incarceration” while releasing accused caretaker
  • Delhi High Court upholds anti-arbitration injunction in ICC dispute — “Non-disclosure by arbitrator strikes at root of impartiality; venue fixation cannot override Indian seat” while restraining continuation of arbitration
  • Delhi High Court refuses to reopen five-year-old ex parte decree — “Knowledge of decree triggers limitation; unexplained delay defeats equity” while dismissing appeal
  • Delhi High Court quashes dowry cruelty case after full settlement — “Matrimonial disputes must be put to quietus once parties part ways amicably” while ending criminal proceedings
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top