Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Home » " Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act
Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025
Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: "Right to Sue Stood Extinguished," Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: “Right to Sue Stood Extinguished,” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the Madras High Court and the trial court, ruling that the second suit filed in 2007 for specific performance was barred…
Posted by Rawlaw January 8, 2025

Recent News

  • Delhi High Court quashes AIIMS rejection of DM Critical Care Medicine candidature—”1095 days residency can be cumulative across institutions, merit cannot be defeated by technicalities”
  • Delhi High Court acquits municipal officer in 1993 bribery case—”Sanction found mechanical, demand of illegal gratification not proved, conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act set aside”
  • Delhi High Court refuses to set aside arbitral award in semiconductor supply dispute—”No perversity in contract interpretation, Section 34 challenge dismissed”
  • Delhi High Court holds security services tender must comply with statutory supervisor norms and GeM random selection rule—”Arbitrary turnover-based award struck down, writ disposed with binding directions”
  • Delhi High Court permits accused to attend brother-in-law’s wedding under strict police custody—”Interim bail declined, humanitarian access allowed”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top