Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Home - " Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Chhattisgarh-High-Court-Sets-Aside-Appellate-Court-Decree-Granting-Possession-in-Ancestral-Property-Dispute—The-burden-to-prove-self-acquired-property-lies-on-the-person-who-asserts-such-acquisition
Posted inNews

Chhattisgarh High Court Sets Aside Appellate Court Decree Granting Possession in Ancestral Property Dispute—”The burden to prove self-acquired property lies on the person who asserts such acquisition.”

Court’s Decision The Chhattisgarh High Court, in SA No. 378 of 1992, allowed the second appeal preferred by the defendants and set aside the judgment and decree dated 08.08.1992 passed…
Posted by Rawlaw June 17, 2025
Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: "Right to Sue Stood Extinguished," Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Second Suit for Specific Performance Barred by Limitation: “Right to Sue Stood Extinguished,” Rejects Delay Beyond Limitation Period Under Order VII Rule 11(d) and Article 113 of Limitation Act

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court overturned the decisions of the Madras High Court and the trial court, ruling that the second suit filed in 2007 for specific performance was barred…
Posted by Rawlaw January 8, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court of India holds miscellaneous application not maintainable after dismissal of special leave petition — “Court becomes functus officio,” recall plea rejected
  • Supreme Court of India: Post-retirement disciplinary penalty valid if proceedings began in service — “Deemed continuation allows pay reduction affecting pension,” appeal dismissed
  • Delhi High Court — Volkswagen fails to block Maruti Suzuki’s ‘TRANSFORMOTION’ trademark — Court finds no deceptive similarity with ‘4MOTION’
  • Supreme Court of India holds state cannot be judge in its own cause in contractual disputes — “Clause barring arbitration and courts read down, arbitral award restored”
  • Supreme Court of India holds reserved category candidates can migrate to open category despite TET relaxation — “Eligibility relaxation does not dilute merit,” merit list exclusion quashed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top