Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rs. 50

Home - Rs. 50

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process

1. Court’s Decision The High Court upheld the trial court’s ruling, dismissing the appellant’s appeal and affirming that the respondent was the rightful owner of the property. Since the appellant…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025

Recent News

  • CESTAT New Delhi holds that “no question arises for granting interest from date of deposit” — Tribunal clarifies that interest on refund of differential customs duty applies only under Section 27A and not Section 35FF
  • Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal: “Export Is Complete the Moment Goods Cross India’s Borders” — Tribunal Quashes Confiscation and Restores Drawback for Shipments Diverted to Dubai, Rejects Revenue’s Reliance on RBI Circular
  • CESTAT: “Suspicion Cannot Replace Proof” — Tribunal Sets Aside Confiscation and Penalties After Finding No Evidence of Overvaluation in Export Incentive Case
  • CESTAT holds that “a person cannot be placed in a more grievous situation for exercising appellate remedy” — Tribunal sets aside confiscation, redemption fine, and duty demand while restoring exemption under ASEAN-India FTA
  • Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top