Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rs. 50

Home - Rs. 50

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process
Posted inNews

Delhi High Court Dismisses Appeal by Permissive Occupant — “Admission of No Ownership Sufficient for Decree Under Order XII Rule 6 CPC”: MoU Held Unenforceable, No Trial Required, Rs. 50,000 Cost Imposed for Abuse of Process

1. Court’s Decision The High Court upheld the trial court’s ruling, dismissing the appellant’s appeal and affirming that the respondent was the rightful owner of the property. Since the appellant…
Posted by Rawlaw May 29, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court Rules Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Orders Passed by Mamlatdars Under Section 5(2): “Orders Under Mamlatdars’ Act Are Summary and Not Final Adjudications”
  • Bombay High Court Rules Issuance of Land Acquisition Award Without Notice to Interested Parties is Void: “An Award Made Behind the Back of Affected Persons Cannot Be Sustained”
  • Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Application of Mind: “Mere Existence of Government Scheme Does Not Justify Private Acquisition Without Due Process”
  • Delhi High Court: “Bar under Order XIII-A is attracted if a suit is originally filed under summary procedure” — Summary Judgment Set Aside for Violation of Procedural Mandate
  • Delhi High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Cyber Fraud Case: “No Recovery From the Petitioner and No Allegation of Active Participation” — Bail Granted on Parity with Co-Accused
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top