Rule 10(3)

Home - Rule 10(3)

Posted inNews

Karnataka High Court declares that “suspension cannot be a punishment and must strictly comply with Rule 10(3)” — Court quashes arbitrary suspension for non-application of mind by the employer

Court’s decision The Karnataka High Court, per Justice M. Nagaprasanna, allowed the writ petition filed by a government employee challenging his suspension order issued under Rule 10 of the Karnataka…

Posted by

Rawlaw November 20, 2025

Recent News

Supreme Court of India holds that “we find no good reason to interfere with the impugned order” — Apex Court upholds CESTAT’s ruling in indirect tax dispute and dismisses appeal filed by revenue authorities
Supreme Court of India observes that “registration under Section 12AA is not by itself sufficient to claim exemption under Section 80G” — Court issues notice in dispute concerning the charitable versus religious character of trust activities
Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh high court holds that “compassionate appointment is not a vested right and must strictly conform to the governing rules” — Court upholds rejection of request for government employment due to absence of legal entitlement
Madras high court holds that “levy of purchase tax is impermissible when the sale itself is liable to tax” — Court quashes Tribunal order and confirms that Section 7A cannot be invoked solely because the seller failed to remit tax
Madras high court holds that “delay in filing Form 10B should not come in the legitimate way of exemptions” — Court quashes rejection order and directs fresh assessment subject to charitable contribution

Scroll to Top