Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • News
  • Services for Advocates
  • Bookmarks
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rule 8D

Home - Rule 8D

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: “Disallowance Cannot Exceed Total Expenditure and Must Follow Objective Satisfaction” — Tribunal Rejects Revenue Appeal on Section 14A, Holds AO Failed to Record Proper Satisfaction
Posted inNews

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai: “Disallowance Cannot Exceed Total Expenditure and Must Follow Objective Satisfaction” — Tribunal Rejects Revenue Appeal on Section 14A, Holds AO Failed to Record Proper Satisfaction

Court’s decision The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai dismissed the Revenue’s appeal and upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), which had deleted the large disallowance made…
Posted by Rawlaw November 16, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court: Keeping employees temporary for years despite perennial work is unfair labour practice — “Nashik District Central Co-operative Bank directed to consider regularisation”
  • Bombay High Court: Axe blow on wife’s neck after drunken quarrel proves murder— “Delay in FIR and inquest before registration not fatal; life sentence upheld”
  • Madras High Court: Motor accident compensation enhanced to ₹15.28 lakh — “Functional disability, not medical disability, determines loss of earning capacity”
  • Madras High Court: Sudden braking by car driver caused fatal bridge accident — “Compensation enhanced to ₹22 lakh despite 30% contributory negligence”
  • Madras High Court: Woman convicted of housebreaking granted bail pending appeal — “Two concurrent sentences do not bar suspension of sentence”
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top