Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation

Home - Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation

Supreme Court Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Criminal Conviction Not Required for Gratuity Forfeiture Under Payment of Gratuity Act; Upholds Full Forfeiture for Fraudulent Employment and Partial Forfeiture for Misappropriation

Court’s Decision The Supreme Court ruled that under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, gratuity can be forfeited if an employee is terminated for misconduct that constitutes…
Posted by Rawlaw February 18, 2025

Recent News

  • ITAT Mumbai Rules on Offshore Drilling Taxation: “Taxation must follow the actual situs of income, not mere contractual possibilities” Deletes ₹16.62 Crore Disallowance for Mobilization Fees Paid Abroad
  • Delhi High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail, Says “Investigation Does Not Appear to Be Satisfactory in Any Manner” While Flagging Possible Evidence Fudging in Alleged Assault Case
  • Bombay High Court Rules Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Orders Passed by Mamlatdars Under Section 5(2): “Orders Under Mamlatdars’ Act Are Summary and Not Final Adjudications”
  • Bombay High Court Rules Issuance of Land Acquisition Award Without Notice to Interested Parties is Void: “An Award Made Behind the Back of Affected Persons Cannot Be Sustained”
  • Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition for Lack of Public Purpose and Non-Application of Mind: “Mere Existence of Government Scheme Does Not Justify Private Acquisition Without Due Process”
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top