Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Rules Legitimacy Conclusively Determines Paternity Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act; Bars Maintenance Claim Revival Due to Res Judicata and Protects Privacy in DNA Testing Disputes

Home - Rules Legitimacy Conclusively Determines Paternity Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act; Bars Maintenance Claim Revival Due to Res Judicata and Protects Privacy in DNA Testing Disputes

Supreme Court Rules Legitimacy Conclusively Determines Paternity Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act; Bars Maintenance Claim Revival Due to Res Judicata and Protects Privacy in DNA Testing Disputes
Posted inNews

Supreme Court Rules Legitimacy Conclusively Determines Paternity Under Section 112 of Indian Evidence Act; Bars Maintenance Claim Revival Due to Res Judicata and Protects Privacy in DNA Testing Disputes

Court’s Decision: The Supreme Court set aside the judgments of the Kerala High Court (dated May 21, 2018) and the Family Court (dated November 9, 2015). It quashed the maintenance…
Posted by Rawlaw January 28, 2025

Recent News

  • Supreme Court on AIFF Elections: “The process must be transparent and democratic” – Court restructures electoral framework, ensures compliance with FIFA requirements, and balances players’ representation with good governance
  • Bombay High Court: “When murder occurs inside the matrimonial home, the burden to explain lies on the husband” – Conviction for axe-killing of pregnant wife upheld, sentence modified
  • Bombay High Court on Civic Planning in Badlapur: “A town with lakhs of citizens cannot survive without sewer lines” – Court directs strict scrutiny of Occupation Certificate, environmental clearances, and remedial action
  • Patna High Court on Public Distribution Shop Selection: “When statutory remedies exist, writ jurisdiction should not be invoked” – Court directs petitioner to file application before Divisional Commissioner, condonation of delay permitted
  • Bombay High Court on Bail in Rape Case: “Seriousness of charges, antecedents, and conduct make applicant unfit for bail” – Court rejects plea citing violent assault, prior POCSO offence, and misuse of procedural rights
Copyright 2025 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top