Skip to content
rawlaw unfiltered legal news
  • Home
  • News
  • Videos
  • Bookmarks
  • Profile
  • facebook.com
  • twitter.com
  • t.me
  • instagram.com
  • youtube.com

Section 13(2)

Home » Section 13(2)
High Court of Madras: “Courts must not disturb confirmed auctions on technicalities” powerful ruling upholding SARFAESI Section 13(4) auction despite borrower’s objections
Posted inNews

High Court of Madras: “Courts must not disturb confirmed auctions on technicalities” powerful ruling upholding SARFAESI Section 13(4) auction despite borrower’s objections

Court’s decision The High Court of Madras dismissed the civil revision petition filed under Article 227 challenging the orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal,…
Posted by Rawlaw November 8, 2025

Recent News

  • Bombay High Court curtails Charity Commissioner’s overreach under public trust law — “Section 41A is about property and income, not moral correction,” apology direction quashed
  • Bombay High Court upholds quashing of stop-work notice under municipal law — “Authority must pass a reasoned order after reply; vague notices cannot stand,” appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court rejects MSME restructuring plea for ₹30 crore loan — “Eligibility under RBI revival framework hinges on loan limit, not outstanding exposure,” writ petition dismissed
  • Bombay High Court upholds arbitral award granting escalation despite restrictive clauses — “A defaulting employer cannot hide behind no-compensation terms,” commercial arbitration appeal dismissed
  • Bombay High Court refuses to appoint arbitrator for railway contract disputes exceeding 20% cap — “Party autonomy permits selective arbitrability; court cannot compel arbitration beyond agreed threshold,” Section 11 application dismissed
Copyright 2026 — Raw Law. All rights reserved.
Scroll to Top